Cinema Craptastíque: The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen

Uncategorized

Who hasn’t read Mark Twain’s classic Tom Sawyer and thought to themselves, after closing the back cover and placing the book gently on a nearby table, “Now that was a fine work of early American fiction, but it just felt like something was missing. I know– flamethrower wielding robots!”

It took 127 years, but Hollywood has finally corrected Twain’s blunder. Sawyer, once embarrassingly robot-free, has been dusted off and given a big budget facelift worthy of the 21st Century. But the authors and filmmakers of “The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen” are smart: they realize that even a Tom Sawyer crawling with robots isn’t enough to fill ninety minutes of unbelievably loud cinema. So they pile on characters and situations from other previously incomplete and unsatisfactory literary works, including 20,000 Leagues Under The Sea, Dracula, Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, Moby Dick, The Invisible Man, and of course, The Portrait of Dorian Gray (I swear, if I see ONE more action movie based on an Oscar Wilde book…).

Based on the graphic novels by Alan Moore (From Hell) and Kevin O’Neill (Judge Dredd) and directed by Stephen Norrington (“Blade”), “The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen” (hereafter LXG) plays like a Masterpiece Theater for the developmentally disabled. This isn’t a crossover for these legendary literary characters so much as a casserole into which they are all tossed, drowned in some generic brand pasta sauce, topped with crushed Ritz Crackers and baked for forty five minutes.

LXG finds legendary adventurer Allan Quartermain (of “King Solomon’s Mines”) having retired from his perilous exploits to the peace and harmony of war torn tribal Africa (?). When the Queen needs his services, Quartermain - played by 107 year old Sean Connery - reluctantly returns to England to get the movie started. Mysterious villains, you see, have been blowing up major European cities and framing rival nations so as to spark a World War. This is an extremely naughty thing to do.

The British government, world leaders in dealing with naughtiness, responds to the threat in the only sensible way: by calling up a roster of people who don’t exist. We don’t get to see it, but I would have enjoyed a scene where the Queen made her request before her bewildered court.

“…and I want Dr. Jekyll, and get me The Invisible Man, and Captain Nemo…”

“Um, Your Majesty…?”

And then they wrestle Her Royal Highness to the floor and give her some pills.

Anyway, the League is assembled and sets sail in the Nautilus to Venice, where the super mysterious villains are known to be planning their next attack (the better villains always have a PR department). The Nautilus – a gargantuan submarine that would dwarf any modern aircraft carrier – navigates the Venetian canals without a single problem. Along the way we learn a little something about each of our heroes that we did not know before. Tom Sawyer, for example, has traded in his white washing brush for a sniper rifle and operates as an assassin for the American Secret Service. No joke. Surely this is the legacy Twain intended to establish.

We also meet the tortured but noble Edward Hyde. Far from the conniving, raping alter-ego of Dr. Henry Jekyll from the original novel, this giant pink CGI creation is more like a misunderstood professional wrestler than a criminal. One part Hulk and two parts crappy animation, Hyde screams and breaks a lot of stuff.

But as insulting as these watered-down action figure versions of Sawyer and Hyde are, they are loving tributes compared with the characterization of Dorian Gray.

Here, in ascending order of inanity are the two major issues I took with the film’s portrayal of Dorian Gray: This Gray, played by the womany Stuart Townsend, is indestructible so long as his portrait is hidden from him. Bullets disintegrate upon contact. Stab wounds heal instantly. And I ache inside. Instead of the tortured, corrupted shell of a man from Wilde’s novel, we meet a smarmy, shaven-chested pretty boy who kills bad guys and drops their bodies to the floor with a catch-phrase and a smirk.

But that’s nothing compared with what happens next: Gray engages in a sexually tense love/hate romance with Mina Harker, the vampire killer. Anyone who has read The Portrait of Dorian Gray with even the slightest comprehension will find the image of Dorian flirting lustfully with a woman …questionable. Yes, there was Sibyl Vane, but c’mon. She was a total beard.

It should be emphasized at this point that even if LXG had featured a cast of original characters and not these literary mutants, it would still be bad enough to qualify as Cinema Craptastíque. The script seems to have been assembled from the descriptive copy on the back of video game packages with a sprinkling of those jokes you find printed on popsicle sticks, and the action is every bit as loud and confusing as a walk through the kitchen at a Japanese restaurant.

The hodge podge of time periods represented by the League’s members gives the filmmakers an excuse to trot out any anachronistic technological device they please. These include the aforementioned flamethrowing robots, an automobile, and a personal submarine the likes of which is unimaginable even by today’s standards.

By the end of its ninety minute run time, I’d say LXG has done more harm to world literature and human civilization in general than all the book burnings throughout history – and all without the pleasant aroma of charred parchment.

There is a moment during the supplemental video features on the DVD where a shamed Sean Connery explains why he took the role in LXG. I had assumed it was part of a court settlement, but apparently not. Connery relates that he had previously turned down roles in “The Matrix” and “Lord of the Rings” because he didn’t “get” the material, only to watch them become two of most successful franchises of all time. When “League” came along and similarly perplexed him, he decided he better not let this one slip away.

Poor Sean. Can’t seem to catch a break.

45 Responses

  1. Angela  •  May 7, 2004 @12:49 pm

    I couldn’t agree more! Even with the aid of a few “adult” beverages I found it IMPOSSIBLE to like any portion of the movie.

  2. ziggysmallz  •  May 7, 2004 @12:56 pm

    if you read the original graphic novel, its fantastic. really dark. the movie however, was crap, except i had to work the red carpet at the premiere, which pretty much menas i got a free trip to vegas, got to wear an earpiece and carry a clipboard, and guide connery and charlize theron around. but that stiukll did not make the movie any better!

  3. chrchpunk247  •  May 7, 2004 @7:09 pm

    It may very well be the worst movie to ever grace the planet

  4. pumpernickel  •  May 7, 2004 @9:44 pm

    No. That title belongs to Double Dragon, You Got Served, or maybe Manos.

  5. JoshWay  •  May 7, 2004 @9:47 pm

    Brian decided long ago and I concur that the worst film of all time is Weekend at Bernie’s 2.

  6. crazyguy  •  May 7, 2004 @11:15 pm

    The worst movie to ever grace the planet is obviously Gigli.

  7. pumpernickel  •  May 7, 2004 @11:34 pm

    I may have to remember Weekend at Bernie’s 2 for the no class movie nights I host up at school. We’ve seen some pretty horrid stuff, but at a buck a movie, it’s all worth while.
    Here’s what I have for a lineup so far, I need one more, so if you have a suggestion please voice it.
    ———————————————————–>
    Weekend at Bernie’s 2
    Ballistic (we rented it before, but never had time to watch it)
    Rollerball
    You Got Served
    _____________

    My fate rests in your hands. Gigli just won’t do it though. We have standards to uphold.

  8. crazyguy  •  May 8, 2004 @10:45 pm

    If you were to show Gigli, everyone that is watching would all of the sudden go satanic on you. And then you would have to show them The Ten Commandments to get them to stop being cannibalistic.

  9. rivkeh  •  May 9, 2004 @12:23 am

    Hated LXG… eventhough Townsend was very pretty. I wanted to like that movie… really, and I couldn’t manage it. That’s how bad it sucked.

  10. pumpernickel  •  May 9, 2004 @10:48 am

    Did you walk out? I’ve always wanted to walk out of a sucky movie, but I rarely go see sucky movies in the theater.

  11. JoshWay  •  May 9, 2004 @12:16 pm

    I’ve only walked out of one movie ever: The Last Action Hero.

  12. ziggysmallz  •  May 9, 2004 @4:16 pm

    How is everybody totally forgetting abot Battlefield Earth!!?

  13. crazyguy  •  May 9, 2004 @10:30 pm

    Is that one of those movies that i have not seen because of my age, what I mean is that I wasn’t around to see it yet.?

  14. JoshWay  •  May 10, 2004 @6:14 am

    Battlefield Earth is only a few years old. It has John Travolta as a large, dredlocked alien. It is the best fantasy film EVER (to be based on a novel by a cult leader).

  15. stematwork  •  May 10, 2004 @10:32 am

    though no one has made this observation:
    i think Josh’s best work is found within the confines of the “scathing rebuke” review
    i always laugh at these things the hardest.

    ok…thats just me.

    the worst movie of all time is dirty dancing
    i wont even argue about this

  16. pumpernickel  •  May 10, 2004 @11:15 am

    C’mon. It has Patrick Swayze, and he’s an all-star!

  17. JoshWay  •  May 10, 2004 @11:43 am

    Thanks for the compliment, stemcell.

    Swayze was in Road House, which Mike Nelson has declared “the finest American film about bouncers.”

  18. ziggysmallz  •  May 10, 2004 @12:34 pm

    did anyone else see Dirty Dancing 2:Havana Nights…. Swasyze has a cameo, as a dance teacher. i don’t think he’s a astraight dance teacher either…

  19. pumpernickel  •  May 10, 2004 @1:37 pm

    Havana Nights? I thought it was Dirty Dancing 2, the Electric Boogaloo.

  20. ziggysmallz  •  May 10, 2004 @6:11 pm

    no, that was Breakin 2, electric Boogaloo

  21. rivkeh  •  May 11, 2004 @1:28 pm

    Oooh, now I’m all confused. I thought Battlefield Earth was the worst movie ever… but I totally forgot to count Dirty Dancing as a movie.

  22. JoshWay  •  May 11, 2004 @1:51 pm

    What did you remember it as - a dish detergent?

  23. stematwork  •  May 11, 2004 @3:11 pm

    can you name one platinum blonde over the age of 30 who isn’t capable of quoting the entire “dirty dancing” script by rote? with a dreamy, sing song quality in her normarlly cigarette encroached voice?

    isn’t this enough to make you want to scream?
    commit suicide?
    watch Ferris Buelers Day Off to remind yourself of quality 80’s programming?

    can you have a conversation made up entirely of questions?

  24. pumpernickel  •  May 11, 2004 @4:21 pm

    In “whose line is it anyway” you can. I hope someone shoots drew carey.

  25. LordHoopla  •  May 11, 2004 @5:01 pm

    Hey, that’s a great show.

  26. JoshWay  •  May 11, 2004 @6:01 pm

    The British version was awesome. The US version is OK.

  27. rivkeh  •  May 11, 2004 @7:15 pm

    As long as it has Ryan Stiles, I’m happy.

  28. pumpernickel  •  May 11, 2004 @8:16 pm

    They just need to find a really good fourth. Colin, Wayne, + Ryan are outstanding, but they haven’t really found a fourth that is good all the time. I really hate it when Drew Carey gets up to participate though, because i don’t find anything about him funny.

  29. JoshWay  •  May 11, 2004 @8:35 pm

    Dude, I’ll concede that Wayne Brady is hilarious on Whose Line…, but ANYWHERE ELSE he is the most unfunny human being ever. He’s less funny than Nietzsche.

  30. pumpernickel  •  May 11, 2004 @10:30 pm

    Isn’t that a concentration camp?

  31. crazyguy  •  May 11, 2004 @10:53 pm

    Wayne Brady is very funny. He is very talented, and is good at singing. I agree anywhere else he is the most unfunny person ever. I watched his show once, and I felt that it wasn’t the same guy. He kept making these really stupid remarks and stupid puns. Ryan Styles is very funny in the Drew Carey Show. Colin is canadian and is hilarious. I think that the fifth person should be Jim Carrey, because Jim Carrey has a lot of physical humor, but he isn’t the best in impromptu. Conan O’brian could also fill the role for the final person also, he is good at both.

  32. JoshWay  •  May 11, 2004 @10:58 pm

    I don’t know if Comedy Central ever shows the British episodes anymore, but they were the best. Colin Mochrie and Ryan Styles were on it, as was Greg Proops. No Wayne Brady or Drew Carey in sight. There were also great British castmembers like Tony Slattery, Jose Lawrence, and that guy who did that stuff.

  33. pumpernickel  •  May 11, 2004 @11:26 pm

    Ohhhh, Greg Proops. Why don’t they keep him as a constant fourth? He is pretty darn good. The worst was when they got that guy from cheers. he was about as pitiful as it gets.

  34. crazyguy  •  May 11, 2004 @11:42 pm

    Greg is the guy with curly hair right?

  35. JoshWay  •  May 12, 2004 @6:06 am

    Yeah, Proops is the guy with curly hair and the Buddy Holly glasses.

    Greg Proops Fun Fact: He was the voice of the English speaking head on that annoying alien announcer at the Podrace in Episode I. Yuk!

  36. stematwork  •  May 12, 2004 @10:26 am

    you guys missed the point

    the point is, dirty dancing is bad

  37. rivkeh  •  May 12, 2004 @12:27 pm

    Greg always ruins himself for me by saying something unfunny and blasphemous almost any time he gets the chance, especially when he’s doing standup.

    By the way, I went to see VanHellsing, and look forward to a Cinema Craptastique about it sometime in the future. (Although I’m tempted to write it up… can junior members do that?)

  38. JoshWay  •  May 12, 2004 @12:30 pm

    You’re a senior member, rivkeh! Have been for a while. Guess I shoulda told ya.

    And I agree about Proops. My enjoyment of him is limited to his Whose Line appearances. He has a regular audio feature on audible.com, and it far more offensive than it is funny.

  39. pumpernickel  •  May 12, 2004 @1:22 pm

    okok, but here’s a good question, why did you go see Van Hellsing? Was it a triple dog dare?

  40. rivkeh  •  May 12, 2004 @1:48 pm

    I saw VanHelsing because someone else was paying, Richard Roxburgh is in it, and there was a good chance that I would get to see Hugh Jackman’s chest.

    Plus, it looked pretty.

  41. crazyguy  •  May 12, 2004 @10:30 pm

    I’m sorry rivkeh but for some reason Hugh Jackson’s chest doesn’t appeal to me. Should I go see it, I am going to the movies this weekend and I have no idea which movie to see.

  42. rivkeh  •  May 13, 2004 @1:29 pm

    Well, as per my review, no. I hear Hellboy is a better bang for your buck, but cannot personally verify this.

  43. crazyguy  •  May 13, 2004 @4:48 pm

    Thank you. I saw you essay after posting the above comment.

  44. zim  •  May 13, 2004 @5:03 pm

    The funny thing about Hellboy is that anybody who liked the trailer, probably hated the movie, but anybody who disliked the trailer is probably goin to love the movie.
    I LIKED IT LOTS

  45. crazyguy  •  May 13, 2004 @10:30 pm

    I didn’t even know that you saw it.

    The only reason why it is like that is becasue, when you like the trailer, it means that you expect to see things just like that in the movie and more. What you don’t know is that movie trailers always higlight the best part of the movie, and , most of the plot, so all that you have left to see is the dialog, and humorous stuff.

Leave a Reply

Allowed tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>